Analog Gaming: Arkham Horror and Survival Horror Games

Want to keep playing after the console’s turned off? Pull out the dice and tokens analog gaming lives on! This time I talk about Survival Horror video games their history and their analog equivalents.

Resident Evil, Silent Hill, Alone in the Dark.  These names are instantly recognizable to gamers.  If you haven’t played the games or are not of fan of survival horror games you’re still aware of them and their meteoric rise to the top of the gaming charts (since to be replaced by the FPS).  But where did the idea of a survival horror come from and does it have parallels in the pen and paper, analog world of gaming?  The answer is of course that it does!

The survival horror genre of games takes a number of disparate elements and combines them to create a unique experience for the player.  The recipe looks something like this:  1 part horror movie, 3 parts adventure game, 2 part action game, 1 part RPG, and 4 parts paranoia and tension, mix, bake at 450 degrees. Viola!  Survival horror.  Resident Evil is usually pointed at as the first survival horror game, and the game created the label.  There were a numbers of video games released before Resident Evil that contained some, if not all, of the elements of the Survival Horror genre, the oldest being Infocom’s The Lurking Horror (1987). It was a text adventure game inspired by H.P. Lovecraft’s writings and known for putting the player on the edge of their seat.

Sweet Home
Sweet Home

Capcom’s Sweet Home (1989) was a horror RPG while not the first graphical horror game (the Atari 2600 had a few but thy’re universally bad and fail to create the fear/tension that is the hallmark for the genre) is an early attempt at creating a game that recreates the fear and tension that horror movies aim at.  Sweet Home has been acknowledge as one of the prime influences on Resident Evil.

Alone in the Dark
Alone in the Dark

The other big influence was Infogrames’ Alone in the Dark (1992) series.  Alone in the Dark was a third person 3-d adventure game that put the player in the role of a man (or woman) trapped in a house consumed by evil, and while combat played a role in the game it was secondary to exploration and puzzle solving.

With Resident Evil, the genre was labeled and came into its own.   The franchise was wildly successful, despite its flaws (and there were many:  clunky slow controls, mixed visuals often too dark, inflated difficulty through item scarcity, restricted saves (damn those ink cartridges), an incoherent story line, etc.)  No, the reason Resident Evil worked was that it gave the same chills and bumps that shock horror films do.  It kept you on the edge of your seat, it created tension and paranoia, and people loved it.  They still do in a way, though the franchise has moved closer and closer to becoming a FPS.

Arkham Horror
Arkham Horror

Survival horror didn’t start on consoles though.  The horror genre is old, remarkably old, and just a little younger than story telling itself.  Our oldest written sources are full of ghosts and nightmarish creatures.  Modern horror’s roots can be found in the 18th century.  Gothic horror rose in the mid 18th century and was focused on “an appreciation of the joys of extreme emotion, the thrills of fearfulness and awe inherent in the sublime, and a quest for atmosphere.”   It was this genre that Lovecraft made his own in the early twentieth century, coupling extreme emotion with alienation and existential horror. It is in the world of table-top RPGs that we find the earliest instance of a game attempting to evoke horror, tension, and paranoia in the player.

The Call of Cthulhu RPG was first released in 1981 and was set in the 1920-30’s that Lovecraft set his own stories the plots that players play start out innocent enough but usually end with the player’s character going insane, if not being horribly maimed or killed by some monstrosity.  Some of the game’s more prominent themes were awe and terror of the unknown and the price such knowledge had on the human psyche

In 1987 Call of Cthuhu was adapted for a board game:  The Call of Cthulhu: the Board Game. The board game attempted to distill Lovecraft’s mythos and the themes of the RPG into a board game that could be played in an hour or so opposed to days.   Unlike acting (on the screen or role-playing) that can create an atmosphere of paranoia and tension through editing and surprise, the board game does so by slowly escalating the difficulty of the game and putting a random time limit on the players before some terror is unleashed upon the earth, an encounter the players rarely survive .  These two things created the tension, paranoia, and at times the fear that are so essential to the horror genre.

I really enjoy Arkham Horror but it certainly isn’t for everyone:

The game in all it's esoteric glory
The game in all it's esoteric glory

There are hundreds of cards and tokens and the rules aren’t intuitive.  Despite this I love the game and it is possible to pick up the game on your own with a couple of understanding friends around to help you figure it out.  I’m always trying to rope 3 or 4 friends together to play the game, those who aren’t intimidated by the board inevitably find they’re having a good time.  If you’re not into competitive games Arkham Horror is perfect as everyone has to cooperate in order to beat the game.   If you’re looking for a less complicated co-op horror game A Touch of Evil is good as well.  So next time your power goes out whilst playing Resident Evil 5, light some candles, and pull out Arkham Horror and play to keep the terrors coming!

Resources:  Fantasy Flight Games – the publishers of Arkham Horror and its expansions, Flying Frog Productions – the publishers of A Touch of Evil, Chaosium – The publishers of Call of Cthulhu, Let’s Play Already: Arkham Horror – An in-depth play through of the game with commentary, pictures, and rule explanation, I used this to help me play my first game

Getting back to Thinking – Part 1 – Time

Help you find some time

Remember when you were a child? Well skip a few years ahead, I can’t remember much of my childhood at all. Remember when you were a teenager? Remember all the thoughts you had?  All the thoughts you thought, all the moral, ethical, philosophical quandaries you deliberated with yourself in your head? All of the things you solved. You solved a lot and you shared it with your friends, and together you solved a great deal more!  When you took your thoughts to another adult though, one older than you, they were disregarded. Superficially investigated and then thrown away… why?  When I was a teenager I didn’t know why and it seemed awfully unfair… then I graduated from high school, got into college, began working and guess what? I stopped having those thoughts, I stopped being torn by ethical dilemmas and philosophical debates with myself and I stopped sharing with my peers.

I think I know why and how that happened, I think I know why “grown-ups” and adults don’t listen to teens.  It isn’t because we know any better, or have valuable life lessons, or whatever bullshit you were given or are now giving out. No, its because I don’t, and most other adults don’t, think anymore!  We simply don’t have the time… we’re too busy working, or pursuing our careers, or work on ourselves, or trying to relax, you can insert whatever it is you do, or see your peers doing.  When was the last time you didn’t have to worry about anything and could just think…

Been quite awhile hasn’t it?

So how do you find these thoughts?  It comes down to time. As a youth, as a teenager you had a lot of time… Time to think thoughts, follow chains of them, reject hypothesis after hypothesis and then synthesize your results from dozens, hundreds, or thousands of little conversations in your head into a cogent (mostly) theory.  All that takes time though, and once you’ve left school, and left home, time becomes a commodity more valuable than gold. So valuable is it now that careerists – those stuck on the corporate or free-lance treadmill are trying to find a way to convert their money back into time! My guess though is that you have a lot of time, you just don’t realize how much of it gets wasted.

First you need to find time then. Where?

Like I said, you probably have mcuh more time than you think you do, you just don’t know how or where you’ve spent it. Here is where something I like to call a time budget comes in.  Just like a normal bugdet, which takes expenses, cash flow, debots and credits a time budget tracks where and how you spend your time.  Keep a time journal for a week, noting how long you spend doing any item, or nothing, after keeping meticulous track of how you spend your time analyze it.  Where are you spending more time than you’d like to?  Where are you wasting time?  How better can you manage it? Once you’ve found areas of improvement, act!  Stop spending so much time in front of a screen (TV, PC, or other).

Once you’ve found the time (and you will!) it’s time to start thinking about what helps you think most!  Which is what the next post on this topic will be about.

Helpful links for finding time:

Finding Time – Stepcase Lifehack

Reclaim your Time – Zen Habits

Finding Time – In Context

Some of my Favorite Philosophers

I was going to do a simple “Top 10” list but I don’t really feel like channeling David Letterman right now, it hurts my jaw when I do that. Also I don’t know if I’ve deeply read ten philosophers. I’ve read more than ten, but just single works which really doesn’t give you constructed context in which they’ve created their works. Even with the philosophers whose works I’ve read completely it can be hard to see exactly what they were getting at. And, with philosophy it is never a monologue you read or listen and you take what is being said and filter it through you’re own experiences and what comes out is sometimes similar to what they said, but often it has changed, occasionally the changes are subtle and it takes awhile to recognize that what you thought the philosopher said is not at all what he did say other times it is completely different and you’ve constructed your own philosophy from the bones of their’s.

I believe it is because of this conversation philosopher’s have with us, the dialogue each one of them creates with the culture surrounding them and the individuals in it, philosophy has remained such a powerful force throughout the ages. But back to the topic at hand my favorite philosophers (so far):

1. Socrates – I could have started with a pre-socratic but why? You wouldn’t recogonize their name or their work, but everyone knows who Socrates is, sorta. We don’t have anything actually written by Socrates we only know him through the writings of two of his students and a Athenian comicwright. If you’ve never read philosophy reading Socrates’ dialogues by Plato are the best place to start. The books are affordable and well translated and it is easy to follow the flow of the argument.

2. Albert Camus – You figured Plato was going to be next didn’t you?  Nope, Plato is an iconic philosopher but he isn’t one of my favorites. Albert Camus was a French Algerian born in 1913 and is most known for his novel The Stranger. Camus is often labeled a existentialist though he didn’t consider himself one. I think the label is appropriate as Camus wholly believes in a universe indifferent to humanity and each human is responsible entirely for creating meaning and purpose in their life. The label is very broad and many existentialists disagree on much. I love Camus because of his great works of fiction and the hope that infuses his philosophy.

3. August Strindberg – What is a 19th century Scandinavian playwright doing on my list? Mostly because his “autobiographical” work Inferno is one of the most mind blowing books I ever read. This is a man haunted by paranoia and persecution who formulates the belief that this life is hell. Everyone here failed in life and is now being punished, of course part of the punishment is not knowing we are being punished. I don’t agree with that philosophy but reading Strindberg was engrossing.

4. Friedrich Nietzsche – Probably still my favorite philosopher. I’ve read all of his works multiple times. Even so, I find new things in them and doubt I understand what he was trying to say. Nietzsche is also an existentialist, one whose reputation was largely destroyed by his self loathing and an overzealous and moronic sister (she is the one responsible for tying his philosophy to Nazism). Nietzsche’s finest idea in my opinion his his thought experiment “the eternal recurrence”, imagine that you have to live your life over and over again, forever. Every decision you make will be the same, as will every action, thought, etc., etc. You will live the same life over and over again. Will you be happy with this life? The person who can say yes is truly living their life, those who can’t need to re-evaluate themselves.  The other powerful idea Nietzsche brings us is the idea of the overman and the last man. The overman is someone who has taken control of their life, has abandoned the rule sets of culture and forged their own, a person who sees joy and suffering as the same, an affirmation of living. The last man? is the pathetic degraded human who has willed away his life to others.

I can’t recommend a detailed reading of Nietzsche’s works enough. Start with something easy though like the Ecco Homo end with Thus Spoke Zarathustra

There are plenty of other philosopher’s to talk about but I think those four are sufficient for now.Investigate them,read and study the. let me know what you think. If you have a favorite philosopher pass them on to me. I like reading new things!

American “Culture”

I was working on Friday with my good friend Muhammad at Borders. He was helping a customer and I was cleaning up magazines. On the cover of last week’s US magazine are the two buffoons you see above. With some sort of headline like, “Eva and Tony tie the knot! We Were There!” Being a trashy rumors rag, it had about a dozen more exclamation points. I turned to Moe and asked him, “Who the hell are these people and why should I care?” He looked at me and said, ” You really don’t know who they are?”
“No, should I?”
“That’s Tony Parker the NBA player of the year.”
“Oh, and her?”
“She’s on that Desperate House Wives show.”
“Hmm, well I guess that’s all right, I mean at least he plays sports, that takes some skill. But who cares? He puts a inflated pig bladder through a tiny hoop, while being oogled by thousands of ‘heterosexual’ men. But her? She plays a whore on some trashy television show? I know half a dozen girls who are whores in real life. They do a better job too. Why aren’t they on the cover of every trashy magazine that the publishing industry excretes into the public?”
This last comment was overheard by one of our customers, who stood there wide-eyed, choking on their laughter. I continued, “Americans are retarded, we don’t have royalty in our country so every dumpy, lazy, fat-assed, house wife (and their daughters, and I don’t know every other ridiculous meat-brick) in the United States wastes half their time obsessing over neanderthals and hookers?! Go America! Why is anyone fighting to preserve ‘our way of life’? What way of life? American culture is the most common denominator. That isn’t an accomplishment, you get there by default. I can’t wait until it’s all wiped away!”

The customer laughed, Muhammad laughed, then I decided to laugh too… While inside a little more of me died. At least the hordes will have something to read in two years when these fools divorce…

You would cry too if it happened to you

%d bloggers like this: